singhvishalkr commented on PR #1123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/1123#issuecomment-4422652469

   @Annaxs thanks for the thorough pass on the four tables and the tarball 
naming check against archive.apache.org.
   
   I pulled upstream \main\ into this branch (merge commit \8fa6e4e1a\) so CI 
tracks the current site, then pushed \1820f461f\: a short comment above the 
Node \excludedVersions\ list explaining that those tags predate the current 
per-version directory layout on dist, plus one extra sentence on the Node 
binaries hint pointing people at the expanded directory row if a hot-linked 
tarball 404s.
   
   On the 1.9.0 concern: I ran HEAD requests against 
\pache-pulsar-client-node-1.9.0.tar.gz\, \1.8.2\, and \1.17.0\ on 
archive.apache.org just now; all returned 200. If you still see a mirror edge 
case, paste the version and we can add it to the exclusion list or split the 
row logic.
   
   @lhotari this branch is rebased on current \main\; ready whenever you have 
review bandwidth.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to