Dream95 opened a new pull request, #25967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/25967

   
   <!--
   ### Contribution Checklist
   
     - PR title format should be *[type][component] summary*. The valid 
`[type]` and `[component]`/scope
       prefixes are enforced by CI (see 
`.github/workflows/ci-semantic-pull-request.yml`); for details,
       see *[Guideline - Pulsar PR Naming 
Convention](https://pulsar.apache.org/contribute/develop-semantic-title/)*.
   
     - Fill out the template below to describe the changes contributed by the 
pull request. That will give reviewers the context they need to do the review.
   
     - The **Motivation** and **Modifications** sections are required: explain 
*why* (the problem/context)
       and *what/how* (the change). A title alone, or a description that only 
restates the title, is not enough.
   
     - Each pull request should address only one issue, not mix up code from 
multiple issues.
   
     - Each commit in the pull request has a meaningful commit message
   
     - For the local build/test/PR workflow see `CONTRIBUTING.md`, and for 
coding conventions see
       `CODING.md`. If you use an AI coding assistant, see `AGENTS.md`.
   
     - Once all items of the checklist are addressed, remove the above text and 
this checklist, leaving only the filled out template below.
   -->
   
   <!-- Either this PR fixes/closes an issue — use "Fixes #xyz" or, 
equivalently, "Closes #xyz", -->
   
   
   
   <!-- Details of when a PIP is required and how the PIP process work, please 
see: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/pip/README.md -->
   
   ### Motivation
   
   <!-- Explain here the context, and why you're making that change. What is 
the problem you're trying to solve. -->
   
   
   Pulsar Window Functions currently invoke 
`WindowFunction.process(Collection<Record<X>>, ...)` with **all messages in the 
window** on every trigger. Internally, `WindowManager` already classifies 
events into full, newly added, and expired lists on each activation, but 
`WindowFunctionExecutor` drops `getNew()` and `getExpired()` before calling the 
user function.
   This makes incremental computation inefficient for sliding windows  and 
forces users to manually diff full collections.
   
   ### Modifications
   
   This PR adds **PIP-484**, which proposes:
   - Promote the existing internal `Window<T>` interface to the public API 
(`get()`, `getNew()`, `getExpired()`, timestamps).
   - Add a new `IncrementalWindowFunction<X, T>` interface that receives 
`Window<Record<X>>` on each trigger.
   - Auto-detect the new interface in `WindowFunctionExecutor` with no new 
configuration.
   - Update Functions deployment validation (`FunctionConfigUtils`, 
`FunctionCommon`) to accept the new interface.
   Existing `WindowFunction` implementations remain fully backward compatible.
   
   <!-- Describe the modifications you've done. -->
   
   
   ### Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
   <!-- DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION. CHECK THE PROPER BOX ONLY. -->
   
   *If the box was checked, please highlight the changes*
   
   - [ ] Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
   - [ ] The public API
   - [ ] The schema
   - [ ] The default values of configurations
   - [ ] The threading model
   - [ ] The binary protocol
   - [ ] The REST endpoints
   - [ ] The admin CLI options
   - [ ] The metrics
   - [ ] Anything that affects deployment


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to