chrismiller commented on issue #6484: pulsar-client-admin-2.5.0.jar contains an unshaded protobuf dependency URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/6484#issuecomment-601628401 If a user is providing a protobuf object to the client, then chances are they already have their preferred version of Protobuf on their classpath though? Would it be better to exclude the protobuf classes from the Pulsar jar and require the user to include an appropriate version on their classpath themselves or would that then cause problems on the Pulsar side of things?
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] With regards, Apache Git Services
