cbornet commented on a change in pull request #7303:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/7303#discussion_r442500945



##########
File path: site2/website/blog/2020-06-18-Apache-Pulsar-2-6-0.md
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,400 @@
+---
+author: Penghui Li
+authorURL: https://twitter.com/lipenghui6
+title: Apache Pulsar 2.6.0
+---
+We are very glad to see the Apache Pulsar community has successfully released 
the wonderful 2.6.0 version after accumulated hard work. It is a great 
milestone for this fast-growing project and the whole Pulsar community. This is 
the result of a huge effort from the community, with over 450 commits and a 
long list of new features, improvements, and bug fixes.
+
+Here is a selection of some of the most interesting and major features added 
to Pulsar 2.6.0.
+
+<!--truncate-->
+
+## Core Pulsar
+
+### [PIP-37] Large message size support
+
+This PIP adds support for producing and consuming large size messages by 
splitting the large message into multiple chunks. This is a very powerful 
feature for sending and consuming very large messages.
+
+Currently, this feature only works for the non-shared subscription and it has 
client-side changes. You need to upgrade the Pulsar client version to 2.6.0. 
You can enable the message trunk at the producer side as below.
+
+```java
+client.newProducer()
+       .topic("my-topic")
+       .enableChunking(true)
+       .create();
+```
+
+For more information about PIP-37, see 
[here](https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-37:-Large-message-size-handling-in-Pulsar).
 <br> For more information about implementation details, see 
[PR-4440](https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/4400).
+
+### [PIP-39] Namespace change events (system topic)
+
+This PIP introduces the system topic to store namespace change events. 
Previously, Pulsar only allowed you to set the namespace policy, all topics 
under the namespace followed the namespace policy. Many users want to set the 
policy for topics. The main reason for not using the same way as namespace 
level policy is avoiding introducing more workload on ZooKeeper. 
+
+The original intention of the system topic is able to store topic policy in a 
topic rather than ZooKeeper. So this is the first step to achieve topic level 
policy. And we can easily add support for the topic level policy with this 
feature.

Review comment:
       system topic is **to be** able to 




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to