Huanli-Meng commented on a change in pull request #8249: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/8249#discussion_r507156135
########## File path: site2/docs/client-libraries-websocket.md ########## @@ -145,6 +145,8 @@ Key | Type | Required? | Explanation `maxRedeliverCount` | int | no | Define a [maxRedeliverCount](http://pulsar.apache.org/api/client/org/apache/pulsar/client/api/ConsumerBuilder.html#deadLetterPolicy-org.apache.pulsar.client.api.DeadLetterPolicy-) for the consumer (default: 0). Activates [Dead Letter Topic](https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-22%3A-Pulsar-Dead-Letter-Topic) feature. `deadLetterTopic` | string | no | Define a [deadLetterTopic](http://pulsar.apache.org/api/client/org/apache/pulsar/client/api/ConsumerBuilder.html#deadLetterPolicy-org.apache.pulsar.client.api.DeadLetterPolicy-) for the consumer (default: {topic}-{subscription}-DLQ). Activates [Dead Letter Topic](https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-22%3A-Pulsar-Dead-Letter-Topic) feature. `pullMode` | boolean | no | Enable pull mode (default: false). See "Flow Control" below. +`negativeAckRedeliveryDelay` | int | no | When a negative acked message will be redelivered to DLQ. Review comment: Change this sentence "When a negative acked message will be redelivered to DLQ." to "A negatively-acknowledged message will be redelivered to the DLQ." or "When a message is negatively acknowledged, it will be redelivered to the DLQ." Does this make sense? Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
