MarvinCai commented on a change in pull request #9163:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/9163#discussion_r562184769



##########
File path: 
pulsar-client/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/impl/ConsumerImpl.java
##########
@@ -320,26 +320,31 @@ protected ConsumerImpl(PulsarClientImpl client, String 
topic, ConsumerConfigurat
         }
 
         if (conf.getDeadLetterPolicy() != null) {
-            possibleSendToDeadLetterTopicMessages = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
-            if 
(StringUtils.isNotBlank(conf.getDeadLetterPolicy().getDeadLetterTopic())) {
-                this.deadLetterPolicy = DeadLetterPolicy.builder()
-                        
.maxRedeliverCount(conf.getDeadLetterPolicy().getMaxRedeliverCount())
-                        
.deadLetterTopic(conf.getDeadLetterPolicy().getDeadLetterTopic())
-                        .build();
+            // DLQ only supports non-ordered subscriptions, don't enable DLQ 
on Key_Shared subType since it require message ordering for given key.
+            if (conf.getSubscriptionType() != SubscriptionType.Key_Shared) {
+                possibleSendToDeadLetterTopicMessages = new 
ConcurrentHashMap<>();
             } else {
-                this.deadLetterPolicy = DeadLetterPolicy.builder()
-                        
.maxRedeliverCount(conf.getDeadLetterPolicy().getMaxRedeliverCount())
-                        .deadLetterTopic(String.format("%s-%s" + 
RetryMessageUtil.DLQ_GROUP_TOPIC_SUFFIX, topic, subscription))
-                        .build();
+                possibleSendToDeadLetterTopicMessages = null;
+            }
+            DeadLetterPolicy.DeadLetterPolicyBuilder dlpBuilder = 
DeadLetterPolicy.builder()
+                    
.maxRedeliverCount(conf.getDeadLetterPolicy().getMaxRedeliverCount());
+
+
+            if 
(StringUtils.isNotBlank(conf.getDeadLetterPolicy().getDeadLetterTopic())) {
+                
dlpBuilder.deadLetterTopic(conf.getDeadLetterPolicy().getDeadLetterTopic());
+            } else if (conf.getSubscriptionType() != 
SubscriptionType.Key_Shared) {
+                // Not setting a default DLQ is it's Key_Shared subType.
+                dlpBuilder.deadLetterTopic(String.format("%s-%s" + 
RetryMessageUtil.DLQ_GROUP_TOPIC_SUFFIX,
+                        topic, subscription));
             }
 
             if 
(StringUtils.isNotBlank(conf.getDeadLetterPolicy().getRetryLetterTopic())) {
-                
this.deadLetterPolicy.setRetryLetterTopic(conf.getDeadLetterPolicy().getRetryLetterTopic());
+                
dlpBuilder.retryLetterTopic(conf.getDeadLetterPolicy().getRetryLetterTopic());
             } else {
-                
this.deadLetterPolicy.setRetryLetterTopic(String.format("%s-%s" + 
RetryMessageUtil.RETRY_GROUP_TOPIC_SUFFIX,
+                dlpBuilder.retryLetterTopic(String.format("%s-%s" + 
RetryMessageUtil.RETRY_GROUP_TOPIC_SUFFIX,
                         topic, subscription));
             }
-
+            this.deadLetterPolicy = dlpBuilder.build();

Review comment:
       @315157973 Sure can make deadLetterTopic in DeadLetterPolicy final, so 
after the policy is created in ConsumerImpl, if the deadLetterTopic is blank it 
means DLQ is disabled.
   The check conf.getSubscriptionType() != SubscriptionType.Key_Shared is 
actually equivalent to  
StringUtils.isBlank(deadLetterPolicy.getDeadLetterTopic()). We'll need to check 
if DLQ is disabled and for now it's only disabled for Key_Shared so these 2 
checks are basically the same. 
   I can change the check to 
StringUtils.isBlank(deadLetterPolicy.getDeadLetterTopic()) since it'll be more 
clear we're checking if DLQ is disabled or not. Do you think it'll be better?




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to