klevy-toast commented on issue #9141: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/9141#issuecomment-771739313
> @klevy-toast You are right, the PIP-58 is e enough to manually implement the back-off logic. It's easy to support exponential back-off for the redelivery since we have exposed the redelivery count to the client-side. @codelipenghui would it be reasonable to create a retry strategy as I described, so that many pulsar users could quickly utilize exponential back-off without re-implementing the logic every time? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
