thiagohernandes edited a comment on issue #13154: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13154#issuecomment-992598827
<img width="826" alt="pulsar-subscription-types" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2352110/145841258-f033f95c-38d6-4fa4-9712-58725571cd0f.png";>  > > > @thiagohernandes Currently, the "exclusive" only works on same `subscritpionName` :) > > > > > > Yes u're correctly!! But the behavior is wrong when a second, .. n.... consumers try to connect. Above example illustrate that. > > I don't think so. If you want the exclusive behavior, you can use the same consumer name. Why don't think? It's so easy to see that behavior on **exclusive** case. If it is exclusive type, **no more one can connect in that**. Shared, everyone can connect. Key based every configured subscriber. Failover the reserve instance keep waiting a fail. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
![https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2352110/145841258-f033f95c-38d6-4fa4-9712-58725571cd0f.png"](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2352110/145841258-f033f95c-38d6-4fa4-9712-58725571cd0f.png"){kind=link}
