Jason918 opened a new issue #13591:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13591


   ## Motivation
   
   Currently, Pulsar client (Java) only checks payload size for max message 
size validation.
   
   Client throws TimeoutException if we produce a message with too many 
properties, see [1].
   But the root cause is that is trigged TooLongFrameException in broker server.
   
   In this PIP, I propose to include message header size when check 
maxMessageSize of non-batch messages, this brings the following benefits.
   1. Clients can throw InvalidMessageException immediately if properties takes 
too much storage space.
   2. This will make the behaviour consistent with topic level max message size 
check in broker.
   3. Strictly limit the entry size less than maxMessageSize, avoid sending 
message to bookkeeper failed.
   
   ## Goal
   
   Include message header size when check maxMessageSize for non-batch message 
on the client side.
   
   ## Implementation
   
   ```
   // Add a size check in 
org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.ProducerImpl#processOpSendMsg
   if (op.msg != null // for non-batch messages only
       && op.getMessageHeaderAndPayloadSize() > ClientCnx.getMaxMessageSize()) {
       // finish send op with InvalidMessageException
       releaseSemaphoreForSendOp(op);
       op.sendComplete(new PulsarClientException(new InvalidMessageException, 
op.sequenceId));
   }
   
   
   // 
org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.ProducerImpl.OpSendMsg#getMessageHeaderAndPayloadSize
   
   public int getMessageHeaderAndPayloadSize() {
       ByteBuf cmdHeader = cmd.getFirst();
       cmdHeader.markReaderIndex();
       int totalSize = cmdHeader.readInt();
       int cmdSize = cmdHeader.readInt();
       int msgHeadersAndPayloadSize = totalSize - cmdSize - 4;
       cmdHeader.resetReaderIndex();
       return msgHeadersAndPayloadSize;
   }
   ```
   
   ## Reject Alternatives
   Add a new property like "maxPropertiesSize" or "maxHeaderSize" in 
broker.conf and pass it to client like maxMessageSize.
   But the implementation is much more complex, and don't have the benefit 2 
and 3 mentioned in Motivation.
   
   ## Compatibility Issue
   As a matter of fact, this PIP narrows down the sendable range. Previously, 
when maxMessageSize is 1KB, it's ok to send message with 1KB properties and 1KB 
payload. But with this PIP, the sending will fail with InvalidMessageException.
   
   One conservative way is to add a boolean config "includeHeaderInSizeCheck" 
to enable this feature. But I think it's OK to enable this directly as it's 
more reasonable, and I don't see good migration plan if we add a config for 
this.
   
   The compatibility issue is worth discussing. And any suggestions are 
appreciated.
   
   [1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13560


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to