Author: sijskes
Date: Wed Aug  8 10:00:24 2012
New Revision: 1370723

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1370723&view=rev
Log:
Applied RIVER-408 patch. thanks to Damjan Jovanovic

Modified:
    river/site/trunk/content/discussion-futuredirection.mdtext
    river/site/trunk/content/discussion-jarpackaging.mdtext
    river/site/trunk/content/index.mdtext
    river/site/trunk/content/user-guide-river-jar-artifacts.mdtext

Modified: river/site/trunk/content/discussion-futuredirection.mdtext
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/site/trunk/content/discussion-futuredirection.mdtext?rev=1370723&r1=1370722&r2=1370723&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- river/site/trunk/content/discussion-futuredirection.mdtext (original)
+++ river/site/trunk/content/discussion-futuredirection.mdtext Wed Aug  8 
10:00:24 2012
@@ -20,6 +20,6 @@ Notice:    Licensed to the Apache Softwa
 
 There is currently a discussion on the dev mailing list which touches on the 
future of River.  In particular if the focus of River should be geared towards 
direct support of "application" developers, support of developers writing "down 
stream" projects or both.
 
-The discussion can be found in the [mail 
archive](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-river-dev/201012.mbox/%[email protected]%3e).
+The discussion can be found in the [mail 
archive](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/river-dev/201012.mbox/%[email protected]%3e).
 
-This is currently unresolved.
\ No newline at end of file
+This is currently unresolved.

Modified: river/site/trunk/content/discussion-jarpackaging.mdtext
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/site/trunk/content/discussion-jarpackaging.mdtext?rev=1370723&r1=1370722&r2=1370723&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- river/site/trunk/content/discussion-jarpackaging.mdtext (original)
+++ river/site/trunk/content/discussion-jarpackaging.mdtext Wed Aug  8 10:00:24 
2012
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ There is a discussion on the mailing lis
 
 It's worth getting involved in this discussion since modifying the JAR 
structure may well have impact on users looking to migrate from the original 
Jini code or previous releases of River.
 
-The discussion can be found in the [mail 
archive](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-river-dev/201101.mbox/%3c1293985847.3904.8.camel@cameron%3e).
+The discussion can be found in the [mail 
archive](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/river-dev/201101.mbox/%3c1293985847.3904.8.camel@cameron%3e).
 
 # Modules
 
@@ -37,4 +37,4 @@ The discussion can be found in the [mail
     * iiop
     * jeri
     * jrmp
- 
\ No newline at end of file
+ 

Modified: river/site/trunk/content/index.mdtext
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/site/trunk/content/index.mdtext?rev=1370723&r1=1370722&r2=1370723&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- river/site/trunk/content/index.mdtext (original)
+++ river/site/trunk/content/index.mdtext Wed Aug  8 10:00:24 2012
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Follow and participate in the vibrant de
 the challenges of fixing bugs in a multi version compatibility environment, 
 the adoption of generics, by subscribing to 
[river-dev](mailto:[email protected]).
 
-To see the full discussion, go to the archive: 
[mail-archives.apache.org](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-river-dev/)
+To see the full discussion, go to the archive: 
[mail-archives.apache.org](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/river-dev/)
 
 # Apache River graduation
 After years of hard work, the contributions of many finally pay off. 
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Feel free to join in and assist by insta
 
 The first project release (v2.1.1 incubating) from the River project has been 
approved by the River Community.
 
-[Here](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-river-dev/200801.mbox/%[email protected]%3E)
 are the Vote Results
+[Here](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/river-dev/200801.mbox/%[email protected]%3E)
 are the Vote Results
 
 Next step is to get Apache Incubator approval for the release.
 
@@ -80,4 +80,4 @@ River is actively looking for people who
  * River-342: [Jini in a Jar - some helpful utilities for 
newbie's](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-342)
  * River-337: [Attempted discard of unknown registrar kills 
LookupLocatorDiscovery thread](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-337)
  * River-332: [Use of Depreciated Interface 
java.rmi.server.RemoteCall](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-332)
-* Updated documentation and tools for new River developers and developers 
using River
\ No newline at end of file
+* Updated documentation and tools for new River developers and developers 
using River

Modified: river/site/trunk/content/user-guide-river-jar-artifacts.mdtext
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/site/trunk/content/user-guide-river-jar-artifacts.mdtext?rev=1370723&r1=1370722&r2=1370723&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- river/site/trunk/content/user-guide-river-jar-artifacts.mdtext (original)
+++ river/site/trunk/content/user-guide-river-jar-artifacts.mdtext Wed Aug  8 
10:00:24 2012
@@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ Title: User Guide - River JAR Artifacts
 # User Guide - River JAR Artifacts
 
 
-The following is an extract from Brian Murphy's 
[post](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-river-dev/201008.mbox/%[email protected]%3e)
 on the developer mailing list highlight some of the history behind the 
River/Jini JAR artifacts.
+The following is an extract from Brian Murphy's 
[post](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/river-dev/201008.mbox/%[email protected]%3e)
 on the developer mailing list highlight some of the history behind the 
River/Jini JAR artifacts.
 
 ... For those who might be wondering about artifacts like jini-core.jar, 
jini-ext.jar, sun-util.jar, etc., although there have been previous postings 
discussing how they are no longer needed, it might help some of the new folks 
on the list to hear a repeat of the history of those artifacts; and why they 
should not be used, and why they should probably be removed from the build.
 
 Back in the old jini 2.x release time frame, there was quite a bit of time and 
thought put into how the distribution should be re-packaged to address 
deployment issues; for example, better modularity, supporting overlays when 
upgrading, etc. That work resulted in the current artifact structure we now 
see; jsk-platform/jsk-lib/jsk-resources/jsk-dl/<service>/<service>-dl.
 
 But because the team did not want to break existing deployments that relied on 
the old jar structure, they decided to also include the old artifacts in the 
release; along with a detailed release note explaining the new philosophy and 
encouraging folks to move to the new model, and be prepared for the removal of 
those old jar files down the road. Unfortunately, due to unforeseen events, the 
removal of the old unnecessary jar files never occurred, and people seem to 
still be using them (at least, based on postings on the various user lists out 
there).
-...
\ No newline at end of file
+...


Reply via email to