[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13583474#comment-13583474
]
Dennis Reedy commented on RIVER-416:
------------------------------------
An issue with this approach is the is name field never gets properly populated.
Perhaps sing reflection to set the name field accessible would work as well.
{code}
final Level parsed = Level.parse(Integer.toString(value));
if (parsed.getClass().equals (Level.class)) {
try {
Field nameField = parsed.getClass().getField("name");
nameField.setAccessible(true);
nameField.set(parsed, name);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException("Unexpected exception", e);
}
return parsed;
} else {
return new CustomLevel(name, value, resourceBundleName);
}
{code}
> The com.sun.jini.logging.Levels class produces a RuntimeException with the
> latest version of Java
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RIVER-416
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-416
> Project: River
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: com_sun_jini_logging
> Affects Versions: River_2.2.0
> Reporter: Dennis Reedy
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: Levels.java
>
>
> The com.sun.jini.logging.Levels class produces a RuntimeException with the
> latest version of Java (both 1.6 and 1.7). The issue surrounds creation of
> custom java.util.logging.Level. The current implementation uses a
> ClassReplacingObjectOutputStream and the LevelData approach. By removing this
> approach and creating a subclass of java.util.logging.Level the issue gets
> resolved.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira