mxsm commented on issue #5698: URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/5698#issuecomment-1354082491
> In general, the configuration of NameServer should be the same and should be hidden behind the load balancing service. At this time, the server maintainer can select random, polling, minimum connections and other policies on the server-side. This centralized management is more conducive to operation and maintenance. @lizhimins I agree with your perspective. This thought comes from encountering resource shortages in the past, where the deployed machines had different configurations. For cloud-based services, this may not be a problem, but for self-maintained machines, cost considerations may result in some machines being downgraded. This leads to different configurations for the deployed machines. I have previously considered setting weights for the NameServer to determine the number of client connections for each machine. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
