oopooa opened a new issue, #7932: URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/7932
### Before Creating the Bug Report - [X] I found a bug, not just asking a question, which should be created in [GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/discussions). - [X] I have searched the [GitHub Issues](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues) and [GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/discussions) of this repository and believe that this is not a duplicate. - [X] I have confirmed that this bug belongs to the current repository, not other repositories of RocketMQ. ### Runtime platform environment Windows 10 ### RocketMQ version RocketMQ 5.2.0 ### JDK Version _No response_ ### Describe the Bug  inconsistent field modifier order. According to [8.3.1 - Classes - Field Modifiers of the Java Language Specification](http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-8.html#jls-8.3.1) For fields, the said production lists the modifiers in this order: `@Annotation` `public` `protected` `private` `static` `final` `transient` `volatile` ### Steps to Reproduce inconsistent field modifier order. ### What Did You Expect to See? standard field modifier order. ### What Did You See Instead? inconsistent field modifier order. ### Additional Context _No response_ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
