JanYork commented on issue #8154: URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/8154#issuecomment-2116488904
> > > When creating the consumer group, did you set it as a FIFO-ConsumerGroup? For reference, use the command > > > `sh mqadmin updateSubGroup -n <nameserver_address> -g <consumer_group_name> -c <cluster_name> -o true.` > > > > Yes, this is inevitable. I have explained above that this is a FIFO-type topic. Commands from the document are used. > > > | | FIFO Consumer Group | non-FIFO Consumer Group | > | :------------: | :-----------------: | :---------------------: | > | FIFO Topic | FIFO | non-FIFO | > | non-FIFO Topic | non-FIFO | non-FIFO | > > So the consumer group is also FIFO？ > yes，I used a simple consumer.And without multithreading concurrency, I only get one message at a time, and when I finish one message, I get the next one. Consumers and producers are single threads, no asynchrony, no concurrency. Get only one message at a time. All messages are in one group and there is only one queue. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
