yuz10 opened a new issue, #8584: URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/8584
### Before Creating the Bug Report - [X] I found a bug, not just asking a question, which should be created in [GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/discussions). - [X] I have searched the [GitHub Issues](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues) and [GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/discussions) of this repository and believe that this is not a duplicate. - [X] I have confirmed that this bug belongs to the current repository, not other repositories of RocketMQ. ### Runtime platform environment Ubuntu 24.04 ### RocketMQ version 5.3.0 ### JDK Version 1.8 ### Describe the Bug issue #3905 adds brokerName in remoting protocol, but in sendMessageBack request, the brokerName is missing. when request proxy, and the broker address is not available in network, the consumer cannot send message back. ### Steps to Reproduce start a consumer that returns RECONSUME_LATER ``` DefaultMQPushConsumer consumer = new DefaultMQPushConsumer("group"); consumer.setNamesrvAddr("localhost:8080"); consumer.subscribe("topic", "*"); consumer.registerMessageListener(new MessageListenerConcurrently() { @Override public ConsumeConcurrentlyStatus consumeMessage(List<MessageExt> msgs, ConsumeConcurrentlyContext context) { System.out.printf("%s Receive New Messages: %s %n", Thread.currentThread().getName(), msgs); return ConsumeConcurrentlyStatus.RECONSUME_LATER; } }); ``` ### What Did You Expect to See? send message back request contains brokerName. ### What Did You See Instead? brokerName is null in send message back request. ### Additional Context _No response_ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
