takagi906 opened a new issue, #1055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/issues/1055

   ### Before Creating the Bug Report
   
   - [x] I found a bug, not just asking a question, which should be created in 
[GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/discussions).
   
   - [x] I have searched the [GitHub 
Issues](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/issues) and [GitHub 
Discussions](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/discussions)  of this 
repository and believe that this is not a duplicate.
   
   - [x] I have confirmed that this bug belongs to the current repository, not 
other repositories of RocketMQ.
   
   
   ### Programming Language of the Client
   
   Go
   
   ### Runtime Platform Environment
   
   macos/arm64
   
   ### RocketMQ Version of the Client/Server
   
   latest
   
   ### Run or Compiler Version
   
   latest
   
   ### Describe the Bug
   
   1. endpoints use a multi-IP model like 127.0.0.1:8080;127.0.0.1:8082
   2. i use producer to send a message
   3. when proxy which ip is 127.0.0.1:8080 crushed, i found message may be 
send failed.
   
   ### Steps to Reproduce
   
   1. endpoints use a multi-IP model like 127.0.0.1:8080;127.0.0.1:8082
   2. use producer to send a message
   3. proxy which ip is 127.0.0.1:8080 crushed, you will found message may be 
send failed.
   
   ### What Did You Expect to See?
   
   If one of the proxy addresses becomes unavailable, gRPC can automatically 
retry using an alternative IP address instead of propagating an error upstream.
   Take Java's gRPC as an example. This behavior is natively supported by its 
built-in failover mechanism.
   
   ### What Did You See Instead?
   
   golang-sdk don't support the grpc failover mechanism.
   
   ### Additional Context
   
   none


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to