Kris20030907 opened a new issue, #10193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/10193

   ### Before Creating the Bug Report
   
   - [x] I found a bug, not just asking a question, which should be created in 
[GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/discussions).
   
   - [x] I have searched the [GitHub 
Issues](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues) and [GitHub 
Discussions](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/discussions)  of this 
repository and believe that this is not a duplicate.
   
   - [x] I have confirmed that this bug belongs to the current repository, not 
other repositories of RocketMQ.
   
   
   ### Runtime platform environment
   
   MacOS
   
   ### RocketMQ version
   
   develop
   
   ### JDK Version
   
   jdk8
   
   ### Describe the Bug
   
   Minimum read offset boundary issue.
   
   `TieredMessageStore#getMinOffsetInQueue` may return an incorrect result when 
the local store does not have a valid min offset but tiered storage still has 
readable data.
   
   At present, the method merges the min offset from the next store and tiered 
store like this:
   
   - return local min offset if tiered min offset is invalid
   - otherwise return `Math.min(localMinOffset, tieredMinOffset)`
   
   The problem is that the local store may return `-1` as a sentinel value when 
no valid local min offset is available. In that case, `-1` is not a real queue 
offset and should not participate in the final comparison.
   
   ### Steps to Reproduce
   
   null
   
   ### What Did You Expect to See?
   
   need to return when the tiered store offset is valid and local store don't 
have valid offset
   
   ### What Did You See Instead?
   
   The effective offset of a tiered store will be ignored, and the method 
returns -1
   
   ### Additional Context
   
   _No response_


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to