RockteMQ-AI commented on issue #10533: URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/10533#issuecomment-4782076102
**Issue Evaluation** Category: `type/enhancement` | Status: **Evaluated** **Feasibility:** Feasible **Scope:** `remoting` module — `SendMessageRequestHeader`, `SendMessageResponseHeader` **Compatibility:** Backward compatible — adds `FastCodesHeader` implementation alongside existing `encode/decode`. Same pattern as #10534 — implementing `FastCodesHeader` for send message headers eliminates reflection overhead on the send path. The send path is equally hot, so this optimization is well-justified. Note: `SendMessageRequestHeaderV2` already implements `FastCodesHeader`, so this would bring V1 headers to parity. Consider whether V1 headers are still actively used or if the effort should focus on V2-only paths. --- *Automated evaluation by RockteMQ-AI* -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
