fuyou001 commented on PR #10640:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/10640#issuecomment-5042318312

   The per-thread scratch buffer approach looks reasonable, and the fallback 
for oversized messages avoids retaining an unexpectedly large buffer in the 
ThreadLocal.\n\nCould we add focused unit tests covering:\n\n- buffer 
allocation and reuse when processing multiple messages on the same thread;\n- 
buffer growth when a larger message is encountered;\n- the transient allocation 
path when the requested size exceeds the reuse cap;\n- corrupted inputs, 
particularly negative or otherwise invalid totalSize values.\n\nSince this is a 
performance-oriented change, could you also share benchmark results comparing 
the implementation before and after the change? It would be useful to 
include:\n\n- throughput and allocation rate;\n- GC frequency or pause time;\n- 
representative message sizes and thread counts;\n- benchmark duration, JVM 
version, heap settings, and methodology.\n\nIdeally, please include several 
message-size distributions, especially a workload with occasional messages 
exceeding 
 the reuse cap. This would help quantify the improvement and verify that the 
ThreadLocal retention and oversized-message fallback behave as intended.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to