yyqdbngt opened a new issue, #2188:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-dashboard/issues/2188

   ### What happened?
   
   The RocketMQ 5 native metrics profile maps semantic broker health to 
`rocketmq_processor_watermark`. That metric represents request-processor queue 
watermarks, not scrape or broker availability: a healthy idle broker can report 
zero and a busy broker can report a positive value. The profile therefore 
exposes load as an `up`-style health signal.
   
   ### Expected behavior
   
   Use the Prometheus `up` series for the RocketMQ 5 broker-health semantic 
metric, consistent with the existing RocketMQ 4 profile and the semantic 
metric's availability meaning.
   
   ### Reproduction
   
   Resolve `broker_health` from the `rocketmq5-native` metric profile. The 
generated query currently aggregates processor watermarks rather than checking 
whether the broker target is scrapeable.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to