zmuxuny opened a new pull request, #6654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-dashboard/pull/6654

   ### Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes
   
   Fixes #6629.
   
   ### Brief Description
   
   Retain valid measured aggregate lag as independent backlog evidence even 
with absent or partial queue observations. Use the larger valid aggregate/queue 
observation for the existing thresholds, emit only one high-group-lag finding, 
and reject explicitly unavailable or invalid aggregate values. This does not 
change unknown-total presentation covered by #6433/#5926/#5564.
   
   ### Verification
   
   Base: rocketmq-studio@779b8c0e7aed2396d3cc72743dcd544ea48e9ae6.
   
   The following validation was completed on October 13, 2026 against the 
prepared source. The fork head and tree were rechecked on October 14; these 
tests are not claimed as a fresh rerun.
   
   Independent related coverage passed 71 tests; final focused verification 
passed 16 utility tests plus the real ConsumerPage regression. Full frontend 
run: 1,615 passed and two unchanged CloudCredential tests failed. At that 
verification point the clean-base single-file run passed all 21 tests, so this 
does not claim those failures were reproduced on base. A separate concurrent 
run that lost its worker after 29 passing tests is not counted as a pass.
   
   TypeScript/production build and artifact-license checks passed. Lint 
reported zero errors and ten existing warnings. Local tests used Node 24, while 
CI uses Node 20. Browser visual QA and a live cluster are not claimed.
   
   Independent source/test review completed. AI assistance was used for 
implementation and regression authoring. Controlled fixtures were used; no live 
production incident, deployment or broker mutation is claimed. Upstream CI for 
this new PR remains to be verified.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to