[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14350485#comment-14350485
 ] 

Geoffry Sumter commented on SAMZA-552:
--------------------------------------

I think 1 is the simplest answer, it's very elegant if your state fits that 
model.

My personal counter-example is a join in physical space where multiple points 
can (as a weighted average) contribute to a final output point. In this case 
it's highly desirable to avoid smoothing even twice, so smoothing every time a 
new bit of contributing data arrives would be very undesirable.

> Tuple or time window semantics in physical operator
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SAMZA-552
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-552
>             Project: Samza
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: sql
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.0
>            Reporter: Yi Pan (Data Infrastructure)
>            Assignee: Yi Pan (Data Infrastructure)
>         Attachments: DESIGN-SAMZA-552-3.md, DESIGN-SAMZA-552-3.pdf
>
>
> The discussion is based on how to support tuple and/or time based window 
> operators in Samza physical operator layer.
> Here are the few observations:
> # Tuple represents the “physical ordering” of events while time-based window 
> has semantic meanings to users
> # Total ordering between tuples are possible within Samza/Kafka given a 
> deterministic MessageSelector on all input streams and offsets within each 
> stream
> # No matter whether tuple or time is used to measure the window size, the 
> window termination condition is needed to close a window to avoid the job to 
> be wedged forever
> The following questions have to be answered to fully implement a window 
> operator:
> # how to determine that a window is closed and no new tuples will be added?
> ## For tuple based, how do we close the window if messages do not come or get 
> delayed?
> ## For time based, how do we close the window if
> ### the messages are not strictly in order w/ the time?
> ### the message w/ timestamp greater than the window boundary does not come 
> or gets delayed?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to