[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-1763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16524205#comment-16524205
 ] 

Peng Du commented on SAMZA-1763:
--------------------------------

Summary of the design: 
 * Extending ReadableTable and ReadWriteTable with async methods
 * Use callbacks to be the async tokens between app and table framework
 * Add async methods to Table functions to leverage native async support
 * Wrap the callbacks from the task to provide common logging and metrics
 * Extend CachingTable with the same set of async methods
 * Add a queue to buffer pending requests and a thread to dispatch them for 
non-blocking rate limiting

> Implement async versions of the table API 
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SAMZA-1763
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-1763
>             Project: Samza
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Peng Du
>            Assignee: Peng Du
>            Priority: Major
>
> In Samza, Table API provides a consistent and simple way to perform IO with 
> non-stream data sources, eg. key-value stores. It can be used in high-level 
> API in the form of stream-table join and sendTo operators. Low-level API 
> integration is also being worked on. 
> The current set of Table APIs only consists of synchronous versions in that 
> all calls are blocking. Unlike local tables, there is a strong need to have 
> async for remote tables to deliver higher throughput which can otherwise be 
> hindered with full sync executions. 
> Given there is currently no async support in Samza high-level API, the design 
> in this document is mainly targeted for low-level API. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to