[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-2013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16704056#comment-16704056
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on SAMZA-2013:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user ahmedahamid opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/samza/pull/830

    SAMZA-2013: Account for cycles in graph traversal within Execution Planner

    …anner

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/ahmedahamid/samza master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/samza/pull/830.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #830
    
----
commit ec2eae6a96dd305f2f60d3b07c6156bbaa7e6655
Author: Ahmed Abdul Hamid <ahabdulhamid@...>
Date:   2018-11-30T00:21:22Z

    SAMZA-2013: Account for cycles in graph traversal within Execution Planner

----


> Account for cycles in graph traversal within Execution Planner
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SAMZA-2013
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-2013
>             Project: Samza
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ahmed Abdul Hamid
>            Assignee: Ahmed Abdul Hamid
>            Priority: Major
>
> If a user creates a Samza high-level app where the result of a stream-join is 
> sent-to the same table, {{ExecutionPlanner}} ends up infinitely traversing a 
> virtual cycle between the stream-table join and send-to-table operator specs.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to