[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-47?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13894852#comment-13894852
]
Chris Riccomini commented on SAMZA-47:
--------------------------------------
Also, I favor keeping the level DB settings per-partition right now, as opposed
to a global size that we divide by internally. This is the pattern I think we
follow for most other things, and I'd rather have less magic, even if it means
multiplying numbers.
> LevelDB and L1 cache use the same configuration value in KeyValueStorageEngine
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SAMZA-47
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-47
> Project: Samza
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.7.0
> Reporter: Jay Kreps
> Assignee: Jay Kreps
>
> Both seem to key off of
> cache.size
> This is not right. The L1 cache is caching a number of objects and leveldb is
> allocating a number of bytes. In general the leveldb cache should be big
> (tens of MBs) and the L1 cache small (a few thousand).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
