[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14097837#comment-14097837
]
Chris Riccomini commented on SAMZA-371:
---------------------------------------
Do you have an alternative proposal for a shorter name, or do you think the
config name is not too long? I'm open to other proposals. My main gripe is just
that the name is ugly, long, and hard to remember.
I agree that one could group by things other than partition, but the thing
you're grouping will always be a partition (with a system/stream).
We could go with the job.ssp.grouper.factory route. I've been trying to avoid
exposing the "ssp" acronym to end-users since it's totally unclear what that
is, though.
> Rename job.systemstreampartition.grouper.factory
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SAMZA-371
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-371
> Project: Samza
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: container
> Affects Versions: 0.8.0
> Reporter: Chris Riccomini
> Fix For: 0.8.0
>
> Attachments: SAMZA-371-0.patch, SAMZA-371-1.patch
>
>
> The config name job.systemstreampartition.grouper.factory, introduced in
> SAMZA-123, is a bit long and unwieldy. I think we should rename it. Some
> proposals:
> # job.input.grouper.factory
> # job.partition.grouper.factory
> # job.task.grouper.factory
> # job.grouper.factory
> (1) is my preference.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
