[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14126199#comment-14126199
 ] 

Chris Riccomini commented on SAMZA-403:
---------------------------------------

Yea, I think that there was some discussion about this in SAMZA-259, but I 
can't find it now.

It does seem a bit more prudent to keep 0.7.0 as the link for hello-samza as 
well as the docs, rather than "latest". Linking to "latest" may give a bad user 
experience, as stuff could be unstable. [~closeuris], do you remember why we 
decided on "latest" as the link instead of "0.7.0" for the docs?

> Consolidate hello-samza example job in one project
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SAMZA-403
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-403
>             Project: Samza
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: hello-samza
>            Reporter: David Chen
>            Assignee: David Chen
>             Fix For: 0.8.0
>
>         Attachments: SAMZA-403.0.patch, SAMZA-403.1.patch, 
> SAMZA-403.hello-samza.1.patch, SAMZA-403.hello-samza.2.patch, 
> SAMZA-403.hello-samza.3.patch, SAMZA-403.hello-samza.4.patch, 
> SAMZA-403.hello-samza.patch
>
>
> Currently, hello-samza contains two subprojects:
>  * samza-wikipedia - contains the implementation for the jobs and the 
> Wikipedia system
>  * samza-job-package - contains the job configs and assembly
> AFAIK, there is no particular reason why these should live in different 
> subprojects and thus should be merged into a single (sub)project.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to