[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Naveen updated SAMZA-411:
-------------------------
    Description: The current Samza job settings require we need to specify both 
the container configuration and the java memory opts. It would be easier to use 
to the job just had to specify only one memory configuration and we infer the 
container and JMX memory settings from it. It gets a little more interesting 
when have state management, because the state management itself needs some 
memory - which could live outside of JVM (like LevelDB/RocksDB..)  (was: The 
current Samza job settings require we need to specify both the container 
configuration and the java memory opts. It would be easier to use to the job 
just had to specify only one memory configuration and we infer the container 
and JMX memory settings from it. It gets a little more interesting when have 
state management, because the state management itself needs some memory- which 
could live outside of JVM (like LevelDB/RocksDB..))

> Unify memory configuration 
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: SAMZA-411
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-411
>             Project: Samza
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: container
>            Reporter: Naveen
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The current Samza job settings require we need to specify both the container 
> configuration and the java memory opts. It would be easier to use to the job 
> just had to specify only one memory configuration and we infer the container 
> and JMX memory settings from it. It gets a little more interesting when have 
> state management, because the state management itself needs some memory - 
> which could live outside of JVM (like LevelDB/RocksDB..)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to