[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14213197#comment-14213197
]
Yan Fang commented on SAMZA-448:
--------------------------------
One question I have now is that, how will we support the job configuration when
the users do not have Kafka system setup? FileSystem seems working, but the AM
may not be in the same machine as the configuration file. Any thoughts about
that? (Sorry for the distracting in this ticket, maybe I should open a new
ticket later :)
> Pass config from JobRunner to JobCoordinator via ConfigStream
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SAMZA-448
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-448
> Project: Samza
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: container
> Affects Versions: 0.9.0
> Reporter: Chris Riccomini
> Assignee: Chris Riccomini
> Fix For: 0.9.0
>
> Attachments: SAMZA-448-0.patch, SAMZA-448-1.patch, SAMZA-448-2.patch,
> SAMZA-448-3.patch
>
>
> SAMZA-438 modified the AM/local job factories (job coordinator) to pass
> configuration to SamzaContainer via an HTTP server. This ticket is to modify
> the other half of the pipeline: the config passing from the JobRunner to the
> job coordinator to be done via a ConfigStream, rather than an environment
> variable.
> The goal of this ticket is to make the change as transparent as possible.
> {{control-job.sh}} won't be introduced in this ticket. Instead, we'll
> continue using the ConfigFactories that we have, but pass the resolved config
> to the coordinator using the ConfigStream rather than the environment
> variable.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
