[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14281037#comment-14281037
 ] 

Guozhang Wang commented on SAMZA-503:
-------------------------------------

clientId specifies the client who issues the request, while consumerId here is 
used as the replicaId, which specifies whether the request is from a replica 
broker or an ordinary consumer client. I filed KAFKA-1548 some time ago to 
refactor it since its meaning does make people confuse.

> Lag gauge very slow to update for slow jobs
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SAMZA-503
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-503
>             Project: Samza
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: metrics
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.0
>         Environment: Mac OS X, Oracle Java 7, ProcessJobFactory
>            Reporter: Roger Hoover
>            Assignee: Yan Fang
>             Fix For: 0.9.0
>
>         Attachments: SAMZA-503.patch
>
>
> For slow jobs, the 
> KafkaSystemConsumerMetrics.%s-%s-messages-behind-high-watermark) gauge does 
> not get updated very often.
> To reproduce:
> * Create a job that processes one message and sleeps for 5 seconds
> * Create it's input topic but do not populate it yet
> * Start the job
> * Load 1000s of messages to it's input topic.  You can keep adding messages 
> with a "wait -n 1 <kafka console producer command>"
> What happens:
> * Run jconsole to view the JMX metrics
> * The %s-%s-messages-behind-high-watermark gauge will stay at 0 for a LONG 
> time (~10 minutes?) before finally updating.
> What should happen:
> * The gauge should get updated at a reasonable interval (a least every few 
> seconds)
> I think what's happening is that the BrokerProxy only updates the high 
> watermark when a consumer is ready for more messages.  When the job is so 
> slow, this rarely happens to the metric doesn't get updated. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to