Carl-Zhou-CN commented on issue #6716: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/6716#issuecomment-2076121101
> Now there is such a scheduling task, which needs to synchronize many tables regularly. If each form writes a config separately, it will take quite a long time to start seatunnel service. Before 2.3.4, it is possible to write multiple links in a config and synchronize multiple tables at the same time to reduce service startup times, but increase the consumption of link numbers. So I was concerned about JDBC's multi-table read in 2.3.4. However, if the sink terminal does not support it, I guess it will not be used in production. @zhaoruosong hi，He is still in the planning stage, and I haven't had time recently to complete it. If you're interested, you can keep an eye on it. https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/5652 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
