xiaochen-zhou commented on code in PR #8314:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/8314#discussion_r1890118602


##########
seatunnel-connectors-v2/connector-kafka/src/main/java/org/apache/seatunnel/connectors/seatunnel/kafka/source/KafkaSourceSplitEnumerator.java:
##########
@@ -307,10 +307,13 @@ private Set<KafkaSourceSplit> getTopicInfo() throws 
ExecutionException, Interrup
         }
         log.info("Discovered topics: {}", topics);
         Collection<TopicPartition> partitions =
-                
adminClient.describeTopics(topics).all().get().values().stream()
+                
adminClient.describeTopics(topics).allTopicNames().get().values().stream()
                         .flatMap(
                                 t ->
                                         t.partitions().stream()
+                                                .filter(
+                                                        partitionInfo ->
+                                                                
partitionInfo.leader() != null)

Review Comment:
   > > > And what should he do when the partition is restored
   > > 
   > > 
   > > After enabling dynamic partition discovery, the next fetch will occur 
once the partition is restored. If it is not enabled, data will only be written 
to partitions with an existing leader. I think this will not negatively impact 
the user.
   > 
   > This easily gives the impression to users that it is executing as 
expected. Should we also provide failure strategies, although it is not 
mandatory?
   
   Can we provide users with a parameter similar to ignoreNoLeaderPartition, 
which defaults to false, allowing users to choose?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to