DanielLeens commented on PR #10954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/10954#issuecomment-4550230016

   Thanks for the follow-up. On the unchanged head `62ee04d`, Daniel's 
source-level conclusion is still the same as before: the memory-pressure 
motivation is understandable, but the default-value compatibility story still 
needs to be handled explicitly before merge.
   
   There is no new code on the PR head, so I am not starting another full 
review in this round. Happy to re-review once the branch moves.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to