yzeng1618 commented on PR #10951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/10951#issuecomment-4598017700

   One clarification: the issue targets Flink 1.13, whereas this bug has 
already been fixed in Flink 1.14 and later versions. The planned code changes 
will be made in the common module. Is this placement appropriate? Would putting 
the changes into common introduce unnecessary overhead from fallback timers and 
undesirable reflection coupling?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to