DanielLeens commented on PR #10950:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/10950#issuecomment-4648034017

   Thanks all — I think @yzeng1618's hybrid direction is the right way to 
thread the needle here.
   
   On the current unchanged head `9de9ae5`, Daniel's source-level conclusion is 
still the same: the blocker is not "more visibility" in general, it is the 
current shape of unconditional per-split `INFO` logging on the normal 
split-generation path. A summary at `INFO` plus detailed per-split SQL / bound 
values at `DEBUG` (or behind an explicit troubleshooting switch) would address 
the operational need without turning large snapshot jobs into log floods.
   
   Since there is still no new commit after the last Daniel review on this 
head, I am keeping this as a reply on the current discussion rather than 
opening a fresh full review record. If the author pushes an updated patch along 
that hybrid line, I am happy to re-review the new head.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to