SEZ9 commented on issue #10425:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/10425#issuecomment-6051286564

   Thanks @goutamadwant for putting the refreshed table together — a few 
suggestions for whoever updates the tracker.
   
   Rows this thread already supports as Done: Cassandra (#10896), InfluxDB 
(#12247), Pulsar (#10825), Redis (#10601), RocketMQ (#10619) and RabbitMQ 
(#10557). @Anthippi, to close out your question: RabbitMQ is merged into `dev` 
as 556dd79554a3c4a7f3216f7786e95bad3c9066fa, so no new RabbitMQ multi-table 
source work should be started from this umbrella.
   
   Rows I'd like confirmed before they are recorded as Done: IoTDB (#12246), 
Neo4j (#11869) and OpenMldb (#12303). IoTDB and OpenMldb were only announced 
here as prepared, and Neo4j hasn't been discussed in this thread beyond the 
table row. Could you reply with the current merge state of each?
   
   AmazonDynamoDB should no longer read "No matching PR found" now that you've 
picked up that slice in #12665; I'd suggest recording it as "In progress" with 
you as contributor. Please keep the implementation in that single PR using 
`tables_configs`, and link back here when it is ready for review.
   
   MongoDB (Batch) stays an open gap pending confirmation from the previous 
claimant; Elasticsearch and Hudi stay "Pending scope clarification" with the 
notes you wrote. If MongoDB (Batch) gets no response in this thread, please say 
so here before opening a slice for it so we avoid duplicate work.
   
   <!-- streview-comment:1596 -->


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to