DanielLeens commented on PR #12900:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12900#issuecomment-6359863530

   Thanks for the detailed CI update, @hutiefang76, and for confirming from the 
checkout SHA and the target-case logs that 
`KafkaIT.testKafkaAvroNullableRowRoundTrip` and 
`PulsarFormatIT.testPulsarAvroNullableRowRoundTrip` actually executed on 
`132771ef9d1a` (JDK 17). That closes the main E2E evidence gap from my last 
review.
   
   I also checked the rest of that fork Build run (39772092860) on the same 
head. Every job completed as success or skipped except one: 
[`connector-file-local-it (17, 
ubuntu-latest)`](https://github.com/hutiefang76/seatunnel/actions/runs/39772092860/job/119803028876),
 which was cancelled when it hit the two-hour job limit (17:06 to 19:06 UTC). 
Its log was still running Spark parquet and binary file-local cases at that 
point. This PR does not touch `connector-file-local` or any parquet/file code 
(only the Avro format, Kafka, Pulsar and their docs/tests), so this is not 
caused by the diff. The overall `Build` check on the PR is reported as 
`timed_out` because of that one job.
   
   Minimal next step: please re-run only that failed job from the Actions page 
of your fork (for example `gh run rerun 39772092860 --repo 
hutiefang76/seatunnel --failed`, or the per-job rerun button). Please do not 
re-run the whole workflow and do not add unrelated patches. The `dev` 
divergence (ahead 4 / behind 12) is metadata only, with no conflict reported, 
so a sync is not needed for this.
   
   My source-level conclusion is unchanged: no blocking source issue, with the 
schema-reuse work staying in #12940. Once that job passes, I will recheck the 
Build state for this head and update my conclusion; final approval still needs 
a committer. Static analysis only; nothing was executed locally.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to