SEZ9 commented on issue #12565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/12565#issuecomment-6431969718

   @WXPNG just a quick note so nothing is left ambiguous: the status is 
unchanged since the correction above. The earlier PR was closed without 
merging, and current `dev` (`4f5e3293740`) still does not contain the per-table 
restore-offset fix, so the savepoint → add table → restore behavior you 
reported remains open.
   
   If you or someone else is able to pick this up, please link the new PR here. 
Once a candidate exists, re-running your original old-table/new-table row-count 
check against it would give us a useful end-to-end acceptance signal alongside 
the tests.
   
   <!-- streview-comment:2055 -->


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to