DanielLeens commented on PR #13041: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/13041#issuecomment-6473998640
Thanks for the contribution. The CI fact cited in my previous conclusion has changed; this follow-up updates that gate on the unchanged reviewed head, without issuing another full source review. Gate snapshot (2026-10-28T16:02:13+00:00), head `fb51160005963451a5ba4723a224b8355925549b`: [Build](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/122928370685) is `IN_PROGRESS`. An exact-head Build is already pending/in progress. This supersedes any older failed-run diagnosis: let that existing attempt finish and do not start an overlapping rerun. Branch drift alone does not request a source change or a sync. My [previous source conclusion](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/13041#pullrequestreview-5681311486) remains unchanged, including its independent source/documentation requests. CI is not being passed by inference, and this follow-up is not an effective approval. Comparison recorded in this scan: base `dev`, `diverged`, ahead 1 / behind 7, no merge conflict. Branch drift is metadata here and is not an additional sync request. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
