DanielLeens commented on PR #12989: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12989#issuecomment-6473525283
Thanks for the contribution. The CI fact cited in my previous conclusion has changed; this follow-up updates that gate on the unchanged reviewed head, without issuing another full source review. Gate snapshot (2026-10-28T15:43:10+00:00), head `ce088f1fe6be4e54d1739cd5a8986aaad1719a6e`: [Build](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/122618095705) is `SUCCESS`. CI was previously the only remaining technical gate in my conclusion; CI is now passing, so that CI objection is withdrawn and my technical conclusion is clear to proceed. Daniel currently has READ permission. I have not changed the effective GitHub review state to APPROVED; a write-capable maintainer must perform the final approve/dismiss action required by branch protection. Comparison recorded in this scan: base `dev`, `diverged`, ahead 1 / behind 38, no merge conflict. Branch drift is metadata here and is not an additional sync request. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
