DanielLeens commented on PR #12313: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12313#issuecomment-6557765228
The CI fact in my [existing full review of this exact head](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12313#pullrequestreview-5649511594) has changed. That source review is already published; this is a gate clarification, not another full source review on the same version. Source status: the existing review found no blocking source issue. Its non-blocking suggestions are unchanged. The [exact-head fork Build](https://github.com/DanielLeens/seatunnel/actions/runs/40271663550) is now `completed` / `success`, attempt 2. Job conclusions: success=8, skipped=50. Both the fork and Apache-side Build are successful. The prior failed-engine-lane instruction is obsolete. Since Daniel is also the PR author, Daniel cannot supply an independent approval of this PR; a write-capable independent maintainer must issue the final approval. No source patch or additional sync/rerun is requested. The current base comparison is recorded separately. Missing Apache check adoption is distinct from the fork conclusion, and neither is an effective independent approval. Daniel is the author and has READ repository permission. Checked 2026-11-01T12:12:02.247661+00:00; unchanged head `af3277f59ada92ca4da623a7941d89ca462296c0`, base `dev`; compare `diverged`, ahead 5 / behind 69; merge `blocked` / `BLOCKED`; review decision `REVIEW_REQUIRED`. Behind/diverged is recorded independently and does not itself request a sync. Daniel has READ repository permission. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
