DanielLeens commented on PR #12096: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12096#issuecomment-6557784077
The CI fact in my [existing full review of this exact head](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12096#pullrequestreview-5721308646) has changed. That source review is already published; this is a gate clarification, not another full source review on the same version. Source status: the two existing P0 retention-recovery allocation/livelock paths and related retry/documentation requests remain open. CI progress does not clear those source requests. The [exact-head fork Build](https://github.com/DanielLeens/seatunnel/actions/runs/41162813818) is now `completed` / `success`, attempt 1. Job conclusions: success=83, skipped=13. All executed fork jobs succeeded, but the Apache PR still has no accepted Build check in its current rollup. Reconcile workflow permission/check discovery with a write-capable maintainer. This green fork run does not clear the existing P0 source blockers and is not a merge approval. The current base comparison is recorded separately. Missing Apache check adoption is distinct from the fork conclusion, and neither is an effective independent approval. Daniel is the author and has READ repository permission. Checked 2026-11-01T12:13:41.704587+00:00; unchanged head `aa30f22ef2bd316cb707d89ee233e183a152a0d5`, base `dev`; compare `diverged`, ahead 6 / behind 9; merge `blocked` / `BLOCKED`; review decision `REVIEW_REQUIRED`. Behind/diverged is recorded independently and does not itself request a sync. Daniel has READ repository permission. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
