SiriusTL666 commented on PR #13009:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/13009#issuecomment-6623871163

   One addition, since your review noted you inferred but did not confirm that 
the new IT actually ran:
   
   I checked the fork run for this head. The `changes` job detected both e2e 
files and selected the module:
   
   ```
   update_files='[".../FtpFileIT.java", ".../ftp_control_timeout.conf"]'
   ,connector-file-ftp-e2e
   ```
   
   The new case then executed in `updated-modules-integration-test-part-8`, 5 
times across the engine matrix, with no failures:
   
   ```
   Test ...FtpFileIT.testFtpControlTimeoutIsHonouredThroughTheJobConfig is 
running.
   [FtpFileIT#testFtpControlTimeoutIsHonouredThroughTheJobConfig] E2E test case 
cost 27s.
   Test ...FtpFileIT.testFtpControlTimeoutIsHonouredThroughTheJobConfig 
successfully run.
   ...
   5x "successfully run", 0 failures
   ```
   
   At 27–29 s per case against the real vsftpd container, this is a genuine job 
execution, so the distinct source (30000) and sink (15000) values were accepted 
by factory validation and carried through the real read/write path with the 
5-line assertion intact.
   
   Two things worth recording for the merge decision:
   
   - The flaky `JobStateEventTest` failure I mentioned earlier was in an 
unrelated module. A failed-job rerun on the same head completed **fully 
green**, which confirms it was environmental and not caused by this change.
   - The Apache-side Build has since reported SUCCESS for `5c268fe1` as well, 
so both the fork run and the required check are green.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to