[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-17?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13778398#comment-13778398
]
Gregory Chanan commented on SENTRY-17:
--------------------------------------
Posted review board request: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14344/
Approach is a little different than the description here, I left the common
classes in sentry-provider-file instead of creating a new common package.
> Separate sentry-provider to hive specific and non-specific packages
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SENTRY-17
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-17
> Project: Sentry
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Gregory Chanan
> Assignee: Gregory Chanan
>
> SENTRY-9 suggests moving the GroupMappingService to core. I'm thinking of
> just moving it to a sentry-provider-common package, which will eventually
> contain what the non-trivial authorization providers need. That way core is
> just really core model/authorizable/action related code.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
