[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dapeng Sun updated SENTRY-966:
------------------------------
    Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh

> SqoopAuthBindingSingleton uses bad double check locking idiom
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SENTRY-966
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-966
>             Project: Sentry
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Sqoop plugin
>            Reporter: Colm O hEigeartaigh
>            Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
>             Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>         Attachments: SENTRY-966.patch
>
>
> The SqoopAuthBindingSingleton uses the bad double check locking idiom:
> http://www.javaworld.com/article/2074979/java-concurrency/double-checked-locking--clever--but-broken.html
> An easy solution is just to make the variable volatile, but a much better 
> approach is to use the Lazy init holder class idiom, which avoid 
> synchronization altogether.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to