This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

epugh pushed a commit to branch epugh-patch-1
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/solr.git

commit 849ba996f77dbd2ca0d1cb9523d09175a41cef17
Author: Eric Pugh <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Sat Aug 15 14:08:40 2026 -0400

    Fix formatting of commands in indexing guide
---
 .../modules/indexing-guide/pages/indexing-with-update-handlers.adoc   | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git 
a/solr/solr-ref-guide/modules/indexing-guide/pages/indexing-with-update-handlers.adoc
 
b/solr/solr-ref-guide/modules/indexing-guide/pages/indexing-with-update-handlers.adoc
index 68a5ede4935..5f891e8dd41 100644
--- 
a/solr/solr-ref-guide/modules/indexing-guide/pages/indexing-with-update-handlers.adoc
+++ 
b/solr/solr-ref-guide/modules/indexing-guide/pages/indexing-with-update-handlers.adoc
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ Blocks until a new searcher is opened and registered as the 
main query searcher,
 +
 Merges segments that have more than 10% deleted docs, expunging the deleted 
documents in the process.
 Resulting segments will respect `maxMergedSegmentMB`.
-This option only applies in a `<commit> operation`.
+This option only applies in a `<commit>` operation.
 +
 WARNING: `expungeDeletes` is less expensive than optimize, but the same 
warnings apply.
 
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ WARNING: `expungeDeletes` is less expensive than optimize, 
but the same warnings
 +
 Makes a best effort attempt to merge the segments down to no more than this 
number of segments but does not guarantee that the goal will be achieved.
 Unless there is tangible evidence that optimizing to a small number of 
segments is beneficial, this parameter should be omitted and the default 
behavior accepted.
-This option only applies in a `<optimize` operation.
+This option only applies in a `<optimize>` operation.
 Default is unlimited, resulting segments respect the `maxMergedSegmentMB` 
setting.
 
 Here are examples of `<commit>` and `<optimize>` using optional attributes:

Reply via email to