[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STREAMS-497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Steve Blackmon updated STREAMS-497:
-----------------------------------
    Sprint: 0.6.0

> Add streams prefix to project and examples artifactIds
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STREAMS-497
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STREAMS-497
>             Project: Streams
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Steve Blackmon
>            Assignee: Steve Blackmon
>             Fix For: 0.6
>
>   Original Estimate: 4h
>  Remaining Estimate: 4h
>
> It would be better if the project and example modules which do *not* 
> have an artifactId prefixed with "streams-" are updated to use such prefix. 
> Now there are for example the flink-twitter-collection-0.5-incubating, 
> google-gplus-0.5-incubating, etc. modules (6 modules in total) which produce 
> artifacts that IMO are confusing for downstream users what originating 
> project 
> they 'belong' to. 
> And as result their embedded NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files contain a confusing 
> (generated) statement like: 
> google-gplus 
> Copyright 2017 The Apache Software Foundation 
> By correcting the artifactIds to for example streams-provider-google-gplus 
> this 
> would yield the more clear/correct: 
> streams-provider-google-gplus 
> Copyright 2017 The Apache Software Foundation 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to