Author: philip
Date: Wed Sep 29 16:23:27 2010
New Revision: 1002716
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1002716&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: vote for 3 items, approve 2
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?rev=1002716&r1=1002715&r2=1002716&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS Wed Sep 29 16:23:27 2010
@@ -138,28 +138,7 @@ Candidate changes:
Concerns:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/120590
Votes:
- +1: danielsh
-
- * r1000607, r1001009
- Fix 'svnmucc propset'.
- Justification:
- Without this fix, 'svnmucc propset' used with existing URLs complains
- that they exist already, and used in conjunction with a creating
- command (such as 'put') complains that they don't exist. It's
- all rather restrictive.
- Votes:
- +1: cmpilato, gstein
-
- * r1000612
- Add new 'propsetf' subcommand to 'svnmucc'.
- Justification:
- This allows folks to more easily set binary and multi-line
- property values.
- Notes:
- svnmucc isn't a core deliverable, so I'm not quite where it fits
- into our version compatibility promise landscape.
- Votes:
- +1: cmpilato, gstein
+ +1: danielsh, philip
* r1002094
Print a warning about copied directories during commits with limited depth.
@@ -268,3 +247,24 @@ Veto-blocked changes:
Approved changes:
=================
+
+ * r1000607, r1001009
+ Fix 'svnmucc propset'.
+ Justification:
+ Without this fix, 'svnmucc propset' used with existing URLs complains
+ that they exist already, and used in conjunction with a creating
+ command (such as 'put') complains that they don't exist. It's
+ all rather restrictive.
+ Votes:
+ +1: cmpilato, gstein, philip
+
+ * r1000612
+ Add new 'propsetf' subcommand to 'svnmucc'.
+ Justification:
+ This allows folks to more easily set binary and multi-line
+ property values.
+ Notes:
+ svnmucc isn't a core deliverable, so I'm not quite where it fits
+ into our version compatibility promise landscape.
+ Votes:
+ +1: cmpilato, gstein, philip
