Author: hwright
Date: Thu Dec  2 21:24:31 2010
New Revision: 1041589

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1041589&view=rev
Log:
 * STATUS: Move r1028084 group out of the veto list.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?rev=1041589&r1=1041588&r2=1041589&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS Thu Dec  2 21:24:31 2010
@@ -126,6 +126,20 @@ Candidate changes:
    Votes:
      +1: stsp
 
+  * r1028084, r1028125
+    Fix JVM recognition on OS X Snow Leopard (10.6).
+    Justification:
+      Buildings Subversion on OS X 10.6 can be impossible, or more difficult,
+      without porting this.
+    Notes:
+      Apple has updated their JDK structure that results in its JDK not being
+      found on Snow Leopard.  This can be worked around by using the --with-jdk
+      configure option but it was never required before and the JDK structure
+      isn't exactly intuitive enough to expect regular people to know how to
+      find the right path to use.
+    Votes:
+      +1: jwhitlock
+
 Veto-blocked changes:
 =====================
 
@@ -231,19 +245,5 @@ Veto-blocked changes:
      -0: danielsh (authz concerns)
      -1: philip (svnsync_tests.py descend_into_replace is XFail)
 
-  * r1028084, r1028125
-    Fix JVM recognition on OS X Snow Leopard (10.6).
-    Justification:
-      Buildings Subversion on OS X 10.6 can be impossible, or more difficult,
-      without porting this.
-    Notes:
-      Apple has updated their JDK structure that results in its JDK not being
-      found on Snow Leopard.  This can be worked around by using the --with-jdk
-      configure option but it was never required before and the JDK structure
-      isn't exactly intuitive enough to expect regular people to know how to
-      find the right path to use.
-    Votes:
-      +1: jwhitlock
-
 Approved changes:
 =================


Reply via email to