Author: philip
Date: Sat Feb 14 16:45:41 2015
New Revision: 1659810
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1659810
Log:
* STATUS: Remove veto from svnsync r0 mergeinfo fix.
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS?rev=1659810&r1=1659809&r2=1659810&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS Sat Feb 14 16:45:41 2015
@@ -153,6 +153,18 @@ Candidate changes:
+1: rhuijben, julianfoad (without r1659801)
+1: philip
+ * r1646230, r1646250, r1646253, r1656893, r1657182, r1657195, r1657401
+ Make svnsync strip any r0 references from mergeinfo -- issue #4476.
+ Justification:
+ Without this is was not possible to svnsync a repository that contained
+ this kind of mergeinfo that is now considered invalid but previously
+ could be committed.
+ Notes:
+ This is also nominated for 1.7.x. The regression test in this group
+ depends on the issue #4538 fix in r1646505.
+ Votes:
+ +1: julianfoad, philip
+
Veto-blocked changes:
=====================
@@ -166,21 +178,6 @@ Veto-blocked changes:
+1: stsp
-1: breser (see my email to dev@, <[email protected]>)
- * r1646230, r1646250, r1646253, r1656893, r1657182, r1657195, r1657401
- Make svnsync strip any r0 references from mergeinfo -- issue #4476.
- Justification:
- Without this is was not possible to svnsync a repository that contained
- this kind of mergeinfo that is now considered invalid but previously
- could be committed.
- Notes:
- r1643074 (nominated separately) is required for the test to work.
- I would recommend not backporting r1646250 without r1643074.
- This is also nominated for 1.7.x. The regression test in this group
- depends on the issue #4538 fix in r1646505.
- Votes:
- +1: julianfoad
- -1: philip (new test is a FAIL, needs a fix for issue 4538)
-
Approved changes:
=================
